Well, we have zero evidence that any info was passed. And(I rechecked this), it was supposed to be info about Clinton's dealings with Russia - not hacked e-mails, etc. It turned out to be nothing.
If you read the Fox article, nothing was said about it being smart. The Intel guy in the video indicated it was not. But as Greg Jarret pointed out there was nothing illegal - which you would think would be the ultimate litmus test, if this is really a criminal investigation.
Return to Odd
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Reply to message