If that is your assessment of this situation, Russia and the rest then there's really not much for me to add.
I did read the Jarret article and found it to have used the 'He Who Defines the Terms Controls the Argument' tactic. In two seconds I found a definition for treason that read 'the action of betraying someone or something'. Jarret never broaches that, instead choosing to answer the charge only on his own terms while demanding that the word only be allowed use as he chose. On a clear day you can see that coming from miles away. The rest of it flows along similar lines.
So anyway, if Trump and his team have not upset your values then thanks for being open about that.
Return to Odd
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Reply to message