I agree.
MOST vids have better camera work and editing than ZS. However, MOST have poor content, ugly women, fake cum-shots, etc. It is rare to have it all but ZS had the potential....
ZS had HOT women that seemed like true k9 luvers. They usually had trained dogs. The lighting and equiment, as well as the conversion methods were all fine. The camera angles and especially the editing was horrible.
I remember dozens of missed penetration shots, missed pull-outs, too many out-of-focus close-ups of hair, not enough facial expressions of the ladies, not enough wide shots, etc.
Nothing was learned from one tape to the next. It was the same mistakes, over and over.